Skip to content
Bharat Tracker

chart gallery

4460 charts, 4380 live

Derived views — year-on-year, indexed, growth rates — are labelled as derived and are only generated where the underlying series has enough points to make them meaningful. Charts awaiting the ETL backfill are shown explicitly rather than hidden.

4380 matching · page 183 of 183

Suicide rate, age-standardised

low

Year-on-year change — derived from "Suicide rate, age-standardised".

-8-6-4-2024'01'04'07'10'13'16'19'21

A modelled estimate, not a count. WHO models country rates where civil registration is incomplete, and India's is; NCRB publishes India's own recorded suicide figures and they differ substantially from these. This site carries the WHO series because it is comparable across countries and across years, and grades it low confidence because the two sources disagree and neither can settle the other. It is a measure of deaths, not of how common mental illness is — a different question, declared separately and still unfilled. Compare it against the crude rate: where they diverge, the gap is India's changing age structure rather than a change in risk.

sourceWorld Health Organizationverified 2026-09-24

Suicide rate, age-standardised

low

Indexed to first year = 100 — derived from "Suicide rate, age-standardised".

73020406080100120'00'03'06'09'12'15'18'21

A modelled estimate, not a count. WHO models country rates where civil registration is incomplete, and India's is; NCRB publishes India's own recorded suicide figures and they differ substantially from these. This site carries the WHO series because it is comparable across countries and across years, and grades it low confidence because the two sources disagree and neither can settle the other. It is a measure of deaths, not of how common mental illness is — a different question, declared separately and still unfilled. Compare it against the crude rate: where they diverge, the gap is India's changing age structure rather than a change in risk.

sourceWorld Health Organizationverified 2026-09-24

Suicide rate, age-standardised

low

Compound annual growth since first year — derived from "Suicide rate, age-standardised".

-1.5-6-4-20'01'04'07'10'13'16'19'21

A modelled estimate, not a count. WHO models country rates where civil registration is incomplete, and India's is; NCRB publishes India's own recorded suicide figures and they differ substantially from these. This site carries the WHO series because it is comparable across countries and across years, and grades it low confidence because the two sources disagree and neither can settle the other. It is a measure of deaths, not of how common mental illness is — a different question, declared separately and still unfilled. Compare it against the crude rate: where they diverge, the gap is India's changing age structure rather than a change in risk.

sourceWorld Health Organizationverified 2026-09-24

Suicide rate, age-standardised

low

Absolute change vs prior period — derived from "Suicide rate, age-standardised".

-1.5-1-0.500.5'01'04'07'10'13'16'19'21

A modelled estimate, not a count. WHO models country rates where civil registration is incomplete, and India's is; NCRB publishes India's own recorded suicide figures and they differ substantially from these. This site carries the WHO series because it is comparable across countries and across years, and grades it low confidence because the two sources disagree and neither can settle the other. It is a measure of deaths, not of how common mental illness is — a different question, declared separately and still unfilled. Compare it against the crude rate: where they diverge, the gap is India's changing age structure rather than a change in risk.

sourceWorld Health Organizationverified 2026-09-24

Rural tele-density by service area

medium

Telephone connections per 100 rural people, by TRAI service area.

805946747193717546666863695973515960Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata020406080100120

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. The half of the gap that matters: rural tele-density runs far below urban in every service area, and the national figure hides the distance between them.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Rural tele-density by service area

medium

Share of total — derived from "Rural tele-density by service area".

6.75.03.96.26.07.96.06.33.95.55.75.45.85.06.24.35.05.1Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata0246810

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. The half of the gap that matters: rural tele-density runs far below urban in every service area, and the national figure hides the distance between them.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Urban tele-density by service area

medium

Telephone connections per 100 urban people, by TRAI service area.

130200156124116430165196141167115167177151136131121151Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata0100200300400500

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Above 100 everywhere, and above 190 in some areas. Read as SIMs per hundred residents, not as people connected.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Urban tele-density by service area

medium

Share of total — derived from "Urban tele-density by service area".

4.46.75.24.23.9145.56.64.75.63.95.66.05.14.64.44.15.1Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata05101520

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Above 100 everywhere, and above 190 in some areas. Read as SIMs per hundred residents, not as people connected.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Tele-density by service area

medium

Telephone connections per 100 people, by TRAI service area.

1028264999012810013074116858411884108718393Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata050100150

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Tele-density counts connections, not people, so it exceeds 100 per cent wherever people hold more than one SIM — which in urban areas is most of them.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Tele-density by service area

medium

Share of total — derived from "Tele-density by service area".

5.94.83.75.85.37.55.97.64.36.85.04.96.94.96.34.24.85.5Andhra PradeshAssamBiharGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduUttar PradeshWest BengalKolkata0246810

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Tele-density counts connections, not people, so it exceeds 100 per cent wherever people hold more than one SIM — which in urban areas is most of them.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Telephone subscribers by service area

medium

Wireless and wireline subscribers, by TRAI service area.

94301108275289.7149045891064614393870862559Andhra PradeshAssamBiharDelhiGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaKeralaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraMumbaiNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduKolkataWest Bengal020406080100120

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Connections rather than people, and undirected on purpose: more SIMs in a service area is not straightforwardly better.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24

Telephone subscribers by service area

medium

Share of total — derived from "Telephone subscribers by service area".

8.22.69.67.16.52.50.81.27.83.97.79.24.01.23.43.36.17.42.25.2Andhra PradeshAssamBiharDelhiGujaratHaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & KashmirKarnatakaKeralaMadhya PradeshMaharashtraMumbaiNorth EastOdishaPunjabRajasthanTamil NaduKolkataWest Bengal024681012

Service areas are not states. Some cover two states, some split one, and Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata are their own areas — so this is labelled by service area and is deliberately not drawn on the state map, which would assert a correspondence that does not exist. One TRAI report covers one quarter, so this is a snapshot rather than a series over time. Connections rather than people, and undirected on purpose: more SIMs in a service area is not straightforwardly better.

sourceTelecom Regulatory Authority of Indiaverified 2026-09-24