chart gallery
4460 charts, 4380 live
Derived views — year-on-year, indexed, growth rates — are labelled as derived and are only generated where the underlying series has enough points to make them meaningful. Charts awaiting the ETL backfill are shown explicitly rather than hidden.
540 matching · page 21 of 23
Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults)
highAbsolute change vs prior period — derived from "Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults)".
World Bank indicator SH.PRV.SMOK.MA. History is restated by the World Bank as national accounts are revised; this series is rewritten in full on every pipeline run rather than appended to.
Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults) — international comparison
highIndia against comparator countries. The percentage of the male population ages 15 years and over who currently use any tobacco product (smoked and/or smokeless tobacco) on a daily or non-daily basis. Tobacco products include…
World Bank indicator SH.PRV.SMOK.MA. History is restated by the World Bank as national accounts are revised; this series is rewritten in full on every pipeline run rather than appended to.
Mobile data price per GB
mediumAverage retail price of one gigabyte of mobile data.
Nominal rupees, so part of the fall since 2016 is inflation rather than price competition. TRAI's figure is an average realised rate across bundles rather than a tariff, and headline comparisons of India as 'cheapest in the world' usually cite a different basket.
Mobile data price per GB
mediumShare of total — derived from "Mobile data price per GB".
Nominal rupees, so part of the fall since 2016 is inflation rather than price competition. TRAI's figure is an average realised rate across bundles rather than a tariff, and headline comparisons of India as 'cheapest in the world' usually cite a different basket.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumAverage wireless data consumption per data user per month.
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumYear-on-year change — derived from "Mobile data used per subscriber".
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumIndexed to first year = 100 — derived from "Mobile data used per subscriber".
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumCompound annual growth since first year — derived from "Mobile data used per subscriber".
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumShare of total — derived from "Mobile data used per subscriber".
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Mobile data used per subscriber
mediumAbsolute change vs prior period — derived from "Mobile data used per subscriber".
Per data *user*, not per subscriber: people who own a phone but buy no data are outside the denominator, which lifts the average above what an ordinary reading of ‘per subscriber’ would give. The Survey publishes a much longer comparison elsewhere — 0.06 GB a month in 2014 against 25 GB in 2025 — but only as those two endpoints, so it is not spliced onto this series.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumVisits by domestic tourists to states and union territories in a year.
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumYear-on-year change — derived from "Domestic tourist visits".
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumIndexed to first year = 100 — derived from "Domestic tourist visits".
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumCompound annual growth since first year — derived from "Domestic tourist visits".
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumShare of total — derived from "Domestic tourist visits".
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Domestic tourist visits
mediumAbsolute change vs prior period — derived from "Domestic tourist visits".
Visits, not visitors: one person touring four states counts four times, and the total exceeds India's population in most years for that reason.
Foodgrains production
highTotal foodgrain output in a crop year.
Read from the Economic Survey workbook tabchart6, sheet "Chart VI.4". These are the tables behind the Survey's charts, so the series is only as long as the chart needed.
Foodgrains production
highYear-on-year change — derived from "Foodgrains production".
Read from the Economic Survey workbook tabchart6, sheet "Chart VI.4". These are the tables behind the Survey's charts, so the series is only as long as the chart needed.
Foodgrains production
highIndexed to first year = 100 — derived from "Foodgrains production".
Read from the Economic Survey workbook tabchart6, sheet "Chart VI.4". These are the tables behind the Survey's charts, so the series is only as long as the chart needed.
Foodgrains production
highCompound annual growth since first year — derived from "Foodgrains production".
Read from the Economic Survey workbook tabchart6, sheet "Chart VI.4". These are the tables behind the Survey's charts, so the series is only as long as the chart needed.
Foodgrains production
highAbsolute change vs prior period — derived from "Foodgrains production".
Read from the Economic Survey workbook tabchart6, sheet "Chart VI.4". These are the tables behind the Survey's charts, so the series is only as long as the chart needed.
Horticulture production
highTotal horticultural output — fruit, vegetables, spices and plantation crops — in a crop year.
Overtook foodgrains by volume in the mid-2010s, which is the single clearest sign of the shift out of cereal monoculture and is rarely the number quoted.
Horticulture production
highYear-on-year change — derived from "Horticulture production".
Overtook foodgrains by volume in the mid-2010s, which is the single clearest sign of the shift out of cereal monoculture and is rarely the number quoted.
Horticulture production
highIndexed to first year = 100 — derived from "Horticulture production".
Overtook foodgrains by volume in the mid-2010s, which is the single clearest sign of the shift out of cereal monoculture and is rarely the number quoted.